Social media and the side effects
When it comes to social media and misuse, it is first essential to trace the individual responsible for the content. On many sites it is
Michael Coyle
August 16, 2019
When it comes to social media and misuse, it is first essential to trace the individual responsible for the content. On many sites it is
Bitcoin, along with the ever-expanding cryptocurrency industry, rarely stays out of the news for long these days. You may have noticed reports across various media
A Norwich Pharmacal Order acts as a form of disclosure order which is made by a judge under the equitable jurisdiction of the court.
Next week, 13th and 14th November to be exact, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175. The case is an appeal by Independent Print Limited from the decision at first instance as the Court of Appeal decided not to grant permission to appeal and upheld the decision.
It has been revealed that a staggering 287 claims for defamation were filed in the Irish courts last year.
Johnny Depp needs no introduction, the American actor, producer and musician has won the Golden Globe Award and been nominated for three Academy Awards, and now, another achievement  suing the Sun newspaper
It was reported this week that the Sunday Telegraph paid Âsubstantial damages to the general secretary of Finsbury Park mosque after the paper had falsely portrayed Mr Kozbar as a supporter of a violent lslamist extremist. Its end game apparently was not only to smear Mr Kozbar but to link him to the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn.
It has been reported that Martin Lewis, founder of MoneySavingExpert.com, will file a claim against Facebook over allegations of defamation.
Independent Print Ltd, the unsuccessful defendant in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1327 has been granted permission to
Independent Print Ltd, the unsuccessful defendant in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1327 has been granted permission to appeal the Court of AppealÂs decision and subsequent application of Section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013