Understanding Utility Models and Patents for Chinese Businesses
It is essential for Chinese businesses to secure their technology and product designs through the correct intellectual property channels when they bring their ideas to the UK or work with UK partners. Many Chinese companies use the dual track of innovation patents and utility model patents, also known as “small patents,” that China’s system provides for layered protection. However, the UK system is different; it only uses normal patents (and design rights for artistic compositions) and lacks a utility model framework. The absence of utility models, important patent considerations, and alternate methods for obtaining intellectual property rights for technological advancements are all highlighted in this essay that describes how Chinese businesses might safeguard their inventions in the UK.
Comparing the Patent Systems of China with the United Kingdom
In China, an inventor has the option of submitting a utility model (which is not substantively reviewed prior to grant, usually grants more quickly, lasts up to 10 years, and is appropriate for incremental improvements or devices) or an invention patent (which is substantively examined for novelty and inventive step and lasts 20 years). Many Chinese businesses submit two applications for the same innovation: one for a utility model, which provides immediate protection, and another for an invention patent, which provides more robust long-term protection following review.
There is no utility model option accessible in the UK; only complete innovation patents are. In the UK, each patent application will be subjected to a substantive review for inventive step (non-obviousness) and originality. This implies that a Chinese business cannot perform the exact same way in the UK if it is accustomed to acquiring utility models for small enhancements or as a fast defensive publication. Rather, they must modify their approach:
File a UK or European patent application (through the EPO, see below) if the invention satisfies the requirements for patentability, which include novelty and an inventive step that would be difficult for a skilled individual to figure out.
In China, a utility model would have been an option if the innovation was more incremental and might not have passed the inventive step standard, but in the UK, it might not have any patent protection at all. In these situations, think about alternative protection options. For example, if the shape or appearance is novel, could it be eligible for a registered design? If patenting isn’t feasible, might you preserve it as a trade secret (as long as it’s difficult to reverse engineer)? Sometimes a small improvement might still be deemed inventive under the UK/EPO standard, or you might reword the patent claims to highlight a technical effect. In other cases, you might think about filing a patent anyway to see if the examiner might approve it.
Methods for Getting Patent Protection in the UK
There are two main ways for Chinese businesses to obtain patent coverage in the UK:
You can submit a UK national patent application directly to the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). This is appropriate if you wish to address each country independently or if the UK is one of the few target countries. English must be used for the application. The steps are as follows: you pay a small filing fee, submit the application together with claims (or you can submit claims soon after), and at least a description of the invention (in English). If you haven’t already, you must submit claims, an abstract, and a request for an initial search (together with the associated search fee) within a year. Within six months of receiving the request, the UKIPO will typically provide a search report (or sooner if you request it at filing). Similar to China, the application is released eighteen months following the priority date. You have to request a substantive examination (and pay the exam price) by six months following publication, which is usually two years after filing. After that, the UKIPO will assess the patentability of the application. You can apply for accelerated processing (the UK offers acceleration alternatives, for instance, if you have a legitimate reason like suspected infringement or need for investment) or even a combined search and inspection upon filing if you want to move things along more quickly. Some UK patents have been awarded in less than a year due to acceleration. Without extraordinary acceleration, a UK patent could normally be granted in two to four years, depending on the number of inspection rounds required.
European Patent (EP) Application through the EPO: The UK is a party to the European Patent Convention (EPC), a distinct international system rather than an EU entity. The EPO method is often used by Chinese applicants to submit applications to several European nations. The EPO reviews your EP application if you submit one (directly or through the PCT route into Europe), and if approved, it can be validated in the UK (as well as other EPC states). The UK is still covered by European patents, even after Brexit. Because you only have to go through one exam, the EPO route is effective if you want protection in a number of European nations, including the UK. The drawback is expense: if you are only concerned with one country, EPO submissions and legal fees may be more expensive than a single national filing. However, an EP application is the best option for many Chinese businesses considering the larger European market. The patentee must take certain administrative actions to “validate” the European patent in each country of interest after it has been granted. In the UK, this is simple because the official language of the EPO proceedings is English, so validation there usually only requires paying a fee and providing an address for service in the UK; if the patent is already in English, no translation is required. It then has the same legal standing as a national patent in the United Kingdom.
Important Disparities in Strategy and Patentability
innovative Step Threshold: Chinese candidates should be ready for the UK/EPO’s demanding innovative step exam. Although China’s CNIPA also looks at creative step for patents on inventions, the EPO is renowned for its rigorous, organized “problem-solution” methodology. The standard is very low for utility models in China (usually novelty merely, with a formality check). In the UK, many inventions that pass as useful models in China would not be eligible for patent protection. This implies that Chinese businesses trying to patent in the UK need to be practical and discriminating. Make sure the invention offers a significant technical benefit or distinction over current understanding. Searching for patentability is often beneficial (the UKIPO or EPO search will do this for you and deliver results). Be prepared to argue innovation or modify the claims to highlight a novel component if the search yields a large amount of close previous art.
No Grace Period for Public Disclosure: Another distinction is that, under Chinese patent law, disclosures may be made under specific conditions (such as an official exhibition or if someone divulged without your authorization) within a six-month grace period. Additionally, the grace periods in the UK (and EPC) are extremely short (e.g., disclosure due to abuse or presented at specific foreign events). The US-style grace period for an inventor’s public disclosure is not included in either system. The best course of action is to keep your innovation a secret until you have filed it with the UK or EPO. Although many Chinese businesses are accustomed to filing first, it’s important to remember that selling the goods before submitting or posting details about your idea online could compromise your patentability in the UK. Absolute novelty is necessary for any patent protection because there is no utility model to rely on.
Cost and Maintenance: Getting and keeping a UK patent is expensive, however official fees are fair when compared to other nations. Filing prices range from £60 to £90, while search fees cost £150, exam fees cost £100, and grant fees cost about £20. Professional expenses will increase if you hire a patent attorney. Renewal payments are needed every year beginning in year five of a patent’s 20-year term, and they get more expensive every year. According to current rates, the annual cost is a few hundred pounds by year ten and approximately £610 by year twenty. If Chinese businesses want to maintain the patent, they should account for these expenses. Although the sums in RMB are comparatively smaller, renewals in China are also conducted annually following grants; however, covering several European countries entails paying several renewal costs. Some Chinese companies decide to revoke their patents in underperforming markets; this is a common decision to make over time.
Using PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty): If you submitted a PCT application from China, you can choose to enter the regional phase at the EPO (which takes 31 months) or the national phase in the UK (which takes 30 months from priority). The number of countries you care about frequently determines which route (UK national vs. EPO regional). A direct UK national phase entry could save money if it’s just the UK (and perhaps one or two additional countries that aren’t EPO members, even though the majority of European markets are EPC states). It should be noted that the UKIPO frequently accepts search and examination reports from other offices or from the International phase as references, which helps expedite the process. It may be encouraging for the UK examination if CNIPA, the International Search Authority, had already issued a positive report (albeit the UK examiner will make an independent judgement).
No Utility Model, So Think About Design or Trade Secret: A UK-registered design can be a useful tool for products with novel shapes or forms but possibly no patentable new function. It lasts up to 25 years (renewable every 5 years) and is quick (typically only a few weeks to register). It guards against someone producing a product that is identical to yours or very similar. In the UK, registered designs are the equivalent of design patents, which Chinese companies frequently file back home. The UK also automatically grants some unregistered design rights for shapes, albeit these are more time and scope-limited. It might make sense to keep the innovation a trade secret if neither a patent nor a design is appropriate and it is entirely internal (such as a manufacturing method that is hidden from consumers). Common law and, more recently, the Trade Secrets (Enforcement, etc.) Regulations 2018 (derived from an EU directive) provide trade secret protection in the UK. If you choose that path, make sure you have confidentiality policies and NDAs.
In the UK, patent enforcement
The two sides of the coin are enforcement and patent acquisition. Chinese businesses should be aware that the UK has a developed system for litigating patents:
Specialist Courts: The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) and the High Court’s Patents Court are qualified to hear patent cases. The judges have expertise in intricate technological issues. You can use these courts to enforce your UK patent if your competitors violate it. Because IPEC offers a speedier, cost-capped process, it can be appropriate if damages are projected to be less than £500,000 and the issues are relatively simple. The Patents Court is the venue for larger cases (such as those involving significant rivals or injunctions with high financial stakes), and it has the capacity to hear cases worth millions of pounds (for example, numerous cases between big internet corporations, pharmaceutical giants, etc. have been heard in London).
Remedies: UK courts have the authority to order the delivery-up or destruction of infringing items, award damages or an account of profits, and issue an injunction to prevent an infringer from producing or selling the patented product in the UK. Notably, if the case for infringement is particularly strong and the balance of convenience favours early intervention, preliminary injunctions (interim injunctions) may occasionally be obtained soon after filing a lawsuit. Although UK courts have a longer history of providing such relief in patent disputes when merited, this is similar to what Chinese courts have been doing with behaviour preservation orders.
Defence and Nullity: Similar to China, contesting the patent’s validity is a common defence against patent infringement in the UK. For example, if the invention was not truly novel or creative, or if there was another flaw (such as inadequate disclosure), UK patents may be declared void. The UK’s requirements for clarity and adequate disclosure are comparable to those of the EPO. Since any ambiguities could be investigated in court, Chinese patent holders should make sure their English-language patent specifications are comprehensive and unambiguous. You will have the opportunity to defend your patent or change the claims if a rival attempts to invalidate it at the UKIPO (through a post-grant revocation action; keep in mind that, in contrast to the EPO, the UKIPO does not have an opposition period, but anybody can apply to revoke a patent at any time). Freedom-to-operate searches are a good idea as well, not only to check for potential infringement but also to strengthen your own patents by understanding the prior art landscape.
No Utility Model Enforcement Needed: One may ask whether there is an enforcement angle in the UK given the absence of utility models. Not in the United Kingdom. But keep in mind that Chinese utility models only provide protection within China. Your Chinese utility model won’t be useful in a UK court if a competitor manufactures a product in China that violates your Chinese utility model and exports it to the UK. To take action on that in the UK, you would require a UK/EPO patent. As an alternative, you might use the Chinese utility model (prevent export) to stop them at the source. Having aligned patent families in all important markets will allow you to strike at either end of the spectrum of the intricate interplay between multi-jurisdiction IP.
Best Practices for Chinese Companies
Take Advantage of Patent Cooperation: Chinese businesses frequently file in China first, then use PCT to register abroad within a year. It’s a smart tactic to have options. You have 30 months to decide where you want to start the national phase. Make use of that time to observe the outcomes of the global search and to determine market interest in the UK and Europe. If the search is positive, you should definitely think about going to the UK or Europe. If negative, you could remove or modify the application.
Hire UK or European Patent Attorneys: Writing a patent application that meets the requirements of UK/EPO examiners occasionally calls for a different approach or emphasis than one that is solely for China. To make sure the language and claim scope are appropriate for the UK/EPO, it is beneficial to have a European or UK patent attorney examine the patent draft (either at the time of initial filing or at the very least when entering the national phase). A Chinese patent application may not be best translated simply because legal provisions (such as specific claim formats) may differ or subtleties may be missed. Investing in expert counsel might improve your chances of securing a strong UK patent.
Don’t Ignore Design Protection: As previously said, a lot of Chinese businesses are used to submitting design patent applications for product shapes. Use the similar registered design, which is quick and inexpensive in the UK. It is an excellent supplement to patents and can cover areas that patents cannot, such as merely aesthetic innovation. If you created a new electronic gadget, for instance, you would register the external design in addition to patenting the device’s technical features. In this manner, a rival cannot replicate the appearance and feel, even if they develop a technical variation that does not violate the original design.
Keep an eye out for infringement and use customs for patents as well: Although trademarks are the most common intellectual property rights registered with customs, keep in mind that you can also list patents (and designs) on the UK AFA (customs application). You can register a patent with HMRC so that Border Force can seize goods that seem to use your patented invention if you have a UK patent for a product and you think that imitations that violate it might be imported. Naturally, they would require instructions on how to spot a product that is infringing. Since identifying patent infringement at the border is difficult, this is less often than trademark-based seizures, but it is nevertheless a tool in the toolbox.
Keep Up with Legal Developments: Patent law is always changing. The establishment of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) in EU nations (as of 2023), for example, is a recent development in Europe that permits one patent enforcement across numerous EU states; however, the UK decided not to take part because of Brexit. You will now be managing UK patents independently from EU unitary patents, nevertheless, if your portfolio of European patents is sizable. Watch how that impacts your approach; for example, you may file a lawsuit in the UPC for EU nations, but you will still need to file a lawsuit in UK courts for the UK portion. Leading Chinese businesses are already adjusting to this new environment, such as in the telecom sector.
R&D and Patent Culture: In terms of culture, a Chinese company’s standing as a world inventor can also be enhanced by holding UK or European patents. Knowing that you have patents approved by the UKIPO/EPO can reassure UK clients or business partners. Beyond only providing legal protection, it also communicates that your technology is innovative and has undergone rigorous testing, which is important for branding. Although it may not be the main justification for filing, this is a pleasant bonus when promoting to or negotiating with Western partners.
To sum up, in order to preserve innovation in the UK for Chinese businesses, you must rely on the patent system, make sure your applications are good, and make up for the absence of a utility model shortcut by perhaps employing designs or changing your filing approach. The UK’s standard patent system is comprehensive and provides strong protection once you obtain a grant, even though it lacks a petty patent system. Given the large number of patent applications of Chinese provenance in recent years, innovative Chinese enterprises should not be afraid to use the UK and European patent channels; in fact, many already do. To protect your technological advantage in the British market, you can develop a strong portfolio of UK patents with the right planning, guidance, and knowledge of the distinctions. In today’s competitive environment, protecting your innovation abroad is essential, and the UK is a crucial component of that global intellectual property puzzle.
If you would like some further information, please get in touch with our team today info@lawdit.co.uk. We are able to provide legal services in both Chinese and English.
