...

The UKIPO’s Function: Steps, Schedules, and Typical Mistakes Made by Foreign Applicants

The government organisation in charge of managing intellectual property rights in the UK is the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). It is essential for Chinese legal professionals advising clients in the UK to comprehend the function and procedures of the UKIPO. Key intellectual property rights, such as patents, trademarks, and registered designs (as well as the rights of plant breeders), are filed, examined, and registered by the UKIPO. Additionally, it serves as the UK’s receiving office for foreign intellectual property applications, including those submitted under the Patent Cooperation Treaty and Madrid Protocol trademark designations.

Since Brexit, the UKIPO and the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) have operated completely independently of one another; as a result, the UKIPO no longer processes EU trademarks or designs, and vice versa. To obtain protection in the UK, foreign applicants must communicate with the UKIPO directly (or through a UK representation). This page describes the steps and deadlines for the main intellectual property rights at the UKIPO and identifies typical mistakes that applicants from other countries, particularly China, should avoid.

the UKIPO's Function

UKIPO Trademark Procedures:

The UKIPO is in charge of managing trademark registration in the United Kingdom. Following the filing of an application (usually electronically) with the necessary information and class fees, the UKIPO reviews the trademark on an absolute basis to ensure that it is not descriptive, generic, or otherwise non-distinctive for the goods or services. The examiner will provide an examination report (office action) outlining the objections if there are any problems (for example, the mark is overly detailed, or possibly a term is considered derogatory or forbidden). Usually, the applicant has two months (or more time if necessary) to reply or change the application.

As stated in other instances, the UKIPO does not always reject applications on the basis of relative grounds (earlier trademarks), even where there are previous marks that are comparable. Rather, the owners of those previous marks will be informed about the new filing by the UKIPO. After the application is publicized, a two-month opposition period begins. The UKIPO Tribunal will hear proceedings if a previous owner files an opposition.

Similar to Chinese opposition procedures, although usually with more comprehensive evidence (such as proof of use, consumer confusion polls, etc., depending on the case), this entails each party submitting arguments and supporting documentation (in writing). In the UK, it can six to twelve months or longer—for an opposition to make a decision. The mark moves on to registration if no oppositions are submitted or if any are defeated. From filing to registration, the complete process for an unopposed UK trademark typically takes 4–6 months, which is quicker than the average in China.

When filing a trademark in the UK, overseas applicants frequently fall into the following traps:

Address for Service: For all trademark applications, the UKIPO requires an address for service in the UK (or Gibraltar or the Channel Islands). Although foreign applicants frequently include their home country address at the outset, the UKIPO will not communicate with them outside of the UK. Make sure a UK address (usually a UK lawyer or agent) is assigned when filing to prevent any delays or potential lapses. Following Brexit, this regulation was strengthened; even EU addresses are no longer recognised.

Classification Differences: Chinese trademark agents are accustomed to highly detailed item descriptions and a subclass system. In the UK, you should use the Nice Classification to clearly define the intended scope. Class titles and other broad terms, such as “clothing, footwear, and headgear” for Class 25, are acceptable; but, excessively ambiguous terms, such as “machines” without context, will be objected to for being unclear. Make sure descriptions are not misclassified or too general to be useful. If something is incorrect, the UKIPO frequently recommends changes. For instance, the examiner’s report will ask you to make changes if an item is unclear or in the incorrect class. To prevent abandonment, it’s critical to react quickly with any corrections.

Answering Objections: Ignoring the due date for answering an opposition or examination report is another mistake. Although extensions are frequently requested, the UKIPO has comparatively short deadlines (2 months for exam reports and establishing an opposing defence). An overseas applicant may automatically forfeit their privileges if they fail to keep a close eye on communications. Make sure that the UKIPO takes prompt action when it issues a notice (for example, by serving it at your UK address).

Translation and Names: English is the language used by the UKIPO. All filed documentation must be in English or have an English translation attached, such as descriptions in a patent or design or proof of use in an opposition. Chinese businesses must to prepare to translate pertinent content. Additionally, when filing, if your trademark includes Chinese characters, think about include a remark explaining their meaning or transliteration. This will help the examiner understand that the phrase isn’t prohibited. However, if a Chinese character mark is not a popular English word, UKIPO examiners will typically interpret it as a design or figurative feature and will not reject it simply because they cannot read it.

UKIPO Patent Procedures:

The UKIPO is one of two primary avenues for obtaining patent protection in the UK, along with the European Patent Office (EPO) route. Since the UK is still a party to the European Patent Convention, a UK patent can still be obtained through an EPO application; however, the UKIPO validates these patents after they are granted, not awarding them. A Chinese business can apply for a national patent directly to the UKIPO if it simply wants a British patent or would rather handle it locally. While there are some parallels between the procedure and the Chinese patent system, there are also some significant differences:

Filing and Formalities: English (or Welsh, though English is nearly always used) specifications may be submitted with a UK patent application. The UK’s national phase entry deadline, if entering through the PCT route, is 31 months from the priority date; this is a little later than China’s 30-month deadline. A Chinese-language PCT application must be translated upon arriving into the UK because all documentation must be in English.

The UKIPO will perform an initial formalities check and issue a filing date. If the applicant is not the inventor, they must file the statement of inventorship and entitlement (Form 7) within 16 months of the earliest priority date. This is one formal obligation to be aware of. If Chinese applicants are accustomed to the PCT/EPO process, they may ignore this (the UKIPO requires this separate form, while the EPO gathers inventor information at filing). It’s a crucial assignment because missing this deadline could compromise the application.

Search and Examination: The patent application is searched and examined for inventive step and novelty by the UKIPO. A search must be requested by the applicant by default within 12 months of filing (or priority) and a substantive examination must be requested within 6 months of publication, which happens 18 months after filing.

The UKIPO will typically provide the search report within six months and may begin the examination earlier if you request both the search and the examination at the time of filing (this is known as a combined search and examination request). Using faster processing, the UK has seen the fastest grants in less than a year (for example, there is a “Green Channel” for ecologically beneficial technologies that offers acceleration).

However, depending on workload and when you seek it, the substantive investigation may often only take place two to three years after filing if it is not expedited. In general, the duration between filing and receiving a UK patent can vary greatly, ranging from roughly 1-2 years (with acceleration) to 4-5 years if the full permitted delays are utilised. In contrast, an innovation patent in China is normally granted in two to three years on average (assuming examination is sought immediately). In the UK, timetables are comparable, although the applicant has more influence over how quickly or slowly the process proceeds.

Patentability Standards: The UKIPO examiners use criteria that are mostly comparable to those of the CNIPA and the EPO, including the requirement that the invention be novel, include an inventive step (not immediately apparent), and have industrial use. Foreign applicants should be mindful of the exclusions in the UK and Europe, nevertheless. For instance, inventions that are simply abstract, pertain to business plans, regulations, or procedures, or are software algorithms “as such” without a technical contribution will not be granted patents by the UKIPO.

Although the meaning varies, China’s patent law also contains exclusions (such as scientific discoveries, regulations pertaining to mental activity, etc.). In the UK, several software or business process innovations that would be accepted in China might be rejected due to their lack of technological impact. If you have an invention in a borderline industry (software, fintech, etc.), it is crucial to collaborate with patent attorneys who can formulate the claims in a way that highlights technical elements.

Common mistakes made by patent applicants include failing to submit an examination request or reply to an examination report by the deadline. In contrast to CNIPA, which conducts examinations automatically upon request, the UKIPO needs the applicant to proactively request examination and pay the associated price.

The application may expire if a foreign applicant fails to closely monitor the UK-specific deadlines, which may be later than those in other jurisdictions. Fortunately, UKIPO typically sends reminders, and even if an application is rejected for missing a deadline, there are frequently ways to get it reinstated if you catch it early. For instance, if you miss the exam request deadline, you can ask for a discretionary extension or reinstatement if you have a good reason and do so within a specific time frame. Ignoring the annual renewal payments is another mistake. Annual renewal payments are required for patents in the UK beginning on the fourth anniversary of filing (and every year after that).

An annuity business or a local agent may handle these. There is a six-month grace period (with a late fee) to make amends if a renewal is missed; beyond that, the patent will expire. Given that the dates and payment procedures differ, Chinese businesses should set up a system for UK renewals that is distinct from their Chinese renewals.

Procedures for UKIPO Registered Designs:

The UKIPO also registers designs that safeguard products’ aesthetics. This bears some resemblance to design patents in China. An object’s visual design (shapes, patterns, configuration, etc.) can be protected for up to 25 years in the UK with a registered design, and renewal payments are necessary every five years. Because there is no substantive evaluation for innovation, the UKIPO primarily verifies that the application is in order (clear photos, proper identification of the artist if applicable, etc.). As a result, the application process for designs in the UK is quite quick and simple. Unless you decide to postpone publication, a design application can usually be registered a few weeks after it is filed, or even a few days later.

Important considerations and design pitfalls include:

Multiple Designs per Application: Unlike Chinese design patents, which typically only comprise one design per application unless they are variations of a single design concept, a single UK application may have multiple designs. As long as they all belong to the same formal product class (using the Locarno Classification for designs), you can file a number of designs together in the UK, which can be economical.

For instance, as long as the articles are of the same type, a Chinese firm that has a new product line with multiple design variations may submit them all at once. Although incorrect classification is not deadly (the UKIPO has the authority to reclassify ex officio), it is still preferable to do it right.

Illustration Quality: The quality or format of the submitted drawings or photos is the most frequent cause of delays in design registration. Clear representations of the design from the right angles are required by the UKIPO. Images submitted by foreign applicants are occasionally ambiguous or contain unnecessary content (for example, displaying a product in use with background scenery is prohibited; the design should be displayed alone).

Make sure the pictures adhere to UK standards, which usually demand for a simple, neutral background and either sketches or photographs that accurately depict every element of the design you wish to keep safe. Generally, the remainder of a product can be displayed in dotted lines to disclaim it if only a portion of it is claimed, such as the shape of a tool’s handle. These details are important because if they are not, the UKIPO may object and ask for new photos, which would delay everything.

Deferred Publication: You have up to 12 months from the date of filing to postpone the publication of your design application, according to the UKIPO. This is helpful if you aren’t ready to reveal the design to rivals (for instance, if you want to keep it a secret until the product launches later).

But keep in mind that if the registration is deferred, it is not available to the public, and you are essentially unable to enforce it until it is published. A common mistake is to forget to request publication at the conclusion of the deferment period. Until you do so or the maximum 12-month term has passed, the UKIPO will not register the design. To prevent the design from being lost by default, mark that date.

Post-Brexit Design Issues: The UKIPO created “re-registered designs” for all EU Community Designs that were in effect at the end of 2020, just like it did with trademarks. It should be noted that foreign corporations with EU designs now have UK design rights (with new UK numbers) that require independent management (renewals, etc.). In order to keep priority, any EU design applications that were still outstanding by the end of 2020 had to be refiled in the UK by the end of September 2021; if a Chinese company failed to do so, they would have to resubmit without the earlier date.

In the future, to protect a design in the UK, one must either designate the UK using the Hague International Design system or file with the UKIPO. (Chinese applicants can now benefit from filing a single international design application to cover multiple countries, including the UK, as China joined the Hague agreement in 2022.) Keep in mind that a Hague designation or EU design covering the EU does not currently cover the UK; it must be a separate UK designation. Avoid this crucial post-Brexit hazard at all costs: make sure your design filing plan specifically addresses the UK.

Various post-registration actions, including renewals, recordals of reassignment or licensees, and dispute resolution, including oppositions (for trademarks) and invalidation or revocation actions (for patents, trademarks, and designs), are also handled by the UKIPO. For instance, the UKIPO’s tribunal or patent hearing officers handle cases where someone attempts to challenge a patent after it has been granted or invalidate a UK trademark.

The procedures, which frequently call for proof and even a hearing, should be anticipated by foreign corporations engaging in such proceedings. One piece of advice is that many trademark oppositions are handled mostly through written filings; the UKIPO’s tribunal procedures are meant to be accessible and are a little less formal than court proceedings. To handle these, it is usually advisable to work with a UK intellectual property lawyer, particularly if there are local legal quirks (for example, under UK trademark law, the idea of “bad faith” filings may serve as a basis for trademark attacks; this is becoming more and more relevant and somewhat comparable to China’s attempts to restrict bad-faith filings).

One final piece of advise that keeps coming up is to always keep in touch with the UKIPO or your UK reps. The UKIPO is renowned for providing procedural help and for being very responsive. Applicants can monitor trademark, patent, and design progress updates using their online platforms. Utilise these resources to prevent missing due dates.

For instance, the inspection report or any provisional rejection from the UKIPO will be delivered through WIPO if a Chinese applicant files for a UK trademark designation through the Madrid Protocol; it’s crucial to pay attention to those correspondences. In the same way, if the UKIPO discovers a problem with an international (Hague) design filing (for example, that the images are unclear), they will send out a notification that calls for a prompt response via the Hague system.

To Wrap Up

In conclusion, the UKIPO serves as the main hub for intellectual property protection in the country and offers strong mechanisms that are on par with those in China, despite some peculiarities in its own procedures. Chinese specialists ought to handle UK applications with the same care as those filed domestically: make sure all requirements are fulfilled, comprehend the inspection procedures, and monitor action deadlines.

Steer clear of presumptions like “my EU filing covers the UK” (which is no longer true) and “the process will wait for me eternally” (which is not true given the severe deadlines). Foreign applicants can easily acquire and preserve UK IP rights by being proactive and paying attention to the UKIPO’s requirements. When in doubt, seek advice from IP attorneys in the UK; a little local knowledge can help avoid expensive errors. All things considered, the UKIPO is an easy-to-use organisation; Chinese businesses can expand their intellectual property protection to the UK with confidence if they are prepared and aware of potential pitfalls, as the UKIPO will help to protect their inventions, brands, and designs in this significant market.

If you would like some further information, please get in touch with our team today info@lawdit.co.uk. We are able to provide legal services in both Chinese and English.

share this Article

Recent Articles

Written By: