There was little for the ECJ to get excited about, and it felt it did not need to obtain an Advocate General’s opinion on the question. ThisÂ of course is an option for theÂ ECJÂ where it considers that a case raises no new point of law (Article 20, Protocol (No 3). In any event theÂ law regarding Article 5(1) wasÂ heard largelyÂ in the Infopaq, Infopaq II and the Premier League cases.
So what is the answer?
Making temporary copies of a web pageÂ on your screenÂ as you browseÂ the internet would not infringe the copyright in the material on the web page.