Is the Intellectual Property Court working?

Overall its positive namelyÂ

“Legal practitioners are unanimous in their assessment that the ability of SMEs/individuals to gain access to justice has been greatly improved by the reforms

• The costs cap (recoverable scale up to £50,000) and ACM by judges are clearly identified as the most important reforms

• Regarding the costs cap, the benefit is that litigants know their potential exposure before initiating a claim in practice, a costs award of less than £40,000 is commonly awarded to the winning party

• Meanwhile, ACM clarifies and limits claims – greatly speeding up the process of litigation

• The SCT is seen as a useful option – particularly for individuals and small enterprises that previously may not have attempted to litigate

• The damages cap (£500,000) is seen as relatively unimportant (in most cases the interim and/or final injunction is seen as the main goal for litigants)

• The reforms have opened up the IPEC MT to a wider range of representatives – there has been greater participation by patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys, in addition to the continuing presence of solicitors and barristers.”

The report can be read hereÂ

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/447710/Evaluation_of_the_Reforms_of_the_Intellectual_Property_Enterprise_Court_2010-2013.pdf

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles