Intel defeats VLSI in a $3 billion patent infringement lawsuit.

VLSI Technology has initiated three lawsuits against chipmaker Intel, after allegations that the latter infringed on VLSI’s patents. In the first dispute, a Texas jury ruled that Intel must pay the sum of $2.2 billion in damages for the infringement, however that decision is awaiting appeal.

In the second and separate lawsuit, VLSI claimed damages of $3 billion with allegations that Intel infringed on two other patents purchased from NXP Semiconductors, concerning technologies used in MP3 players. Intel stated that its engineering teams have been making processors for various devices throughout the decades. Further, the jury rejected the meritless claims that Intel’s processors could be found to infringe on expired patents connected to the MP3 player technology in question.

The third lawsuit is scheduled for a hearing next month and until then, Intel can enjoy their win against the patent troll. The latter is a term used to describe a company that targets patent infringement claims against market giants, with the aim of making a profit. Besides being a semiconductor manufacturer, VLSI holds no other streams of income other than the lawsuits aimed at Intel. Be sure to stay tuned for further updates on this matter, on our reading room.

In the meantime, if you have any queries regarding the above article or require assistance with an alternative matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch with our expert solicitor team today.

Tel: 023 8023 5979

E-mail: info@lawdit.co.uk

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

What are the benefits of Mediation?

What is Mediation?  Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution which is flexible, voluntary and confidential for all parties involved, and is used to

Skittles v Zkittles trade mark dispute

Earlier this week, the makers of world famous Skittles, Mars Wrigley, commenced legal action against THC infused Zkittles sweets for trade mark infringement. Sweets and