Injunction to remain

The Applicant’s QC Desmond Browne told the supreme court: “This case has been hailed by some as the death knell of the privacy injunction. We hope that reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated.” The incident took place some 4 years ago and the celebrity’s children would be devasted. No date was given and the injunction will continue in force in the meantime.

If the event took place four years ago, before the children were born ( I dont know) how on earth can it be in the public interest to disclose this? That said it does seem silly that if you are in Sotland or the US you can find out who the applicant is. Bottom line who cares?


If you’d like to know more about this article please send an email to Michael Coyle quoting the article title and any questions you might have, alternatively call the office number on 02380 235 979 or send an enquiry through our contact form.

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

How are NFT’s regulated in the UK?

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has not yet provided guidance on NFT’s specifically with regards to regulation in the United Kingdom (UK). However, the FCA

What is an NFT and why create one?

NFT stands for non-fungible token. Non-fungible essentially means the token is unique and cannot be replaced with another. For example, a Bitcoin is fungible, so,