The case found that Article 5(1)(c) of Directive 2000/31 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, must be interpreted as meaning that a service provider is required to supply to recipients of the service, before the conclusion of a contract with them, in addition to its electronic mail address, other information which allows the service provider to be contacted rapidly and communicated with in a direct and effective manner. That information does not necessarily have to be a telephone number. That information may be in the form of an electronic enquiry template through which the recipients of the service can contact the service provider via the internet, to whom the service provider replies by electronic mail except in situations where a recipient of the service, who, after contacting the service provider electronically, finds himself without access to the electronic network, requests the latter to provide access to another, non-electronic, means of communication.
Defamation claim filed by activist Jack Monroe over MP comments
Having been successful for a similar claim in the past, food writer and activist Jack Monroe has filed a libel claim in the UK after