The applicant’s application to register a trade mark was opposed by the respondents. The applicants had been using the name ‘Hope Builders’ for a building service. The respondents had a registered trade mark, ‘Hope’ their services related to charitable fundraising.

The Submissions

The respondent’s averment was to the effect that under section 5(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 there was a likelihood of confusion between the two names.


The court decided that there was no likelihood of confusion in the word ‘hope’ used by two different charities because that word lacked distinctiveness. Yet further, the court found that the two marks view as a how had differing addition text which served to reduce the likelihood of confusion between the names.

Application granted.

If you’d like to know more about this article please send an email to Unknown quoting the article title and any questions you might have, alternatively call the office number on 02380 235 979 or send an enquiry through our contact form.

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

Overview of IP rights

The pandemic has caused many businesses to invest in selling their goods or services online. This has meant that many businesses have had to invest

Burberry granted injunction against Baneberry

Multi billion-dollar luxury fashion brand Burberry has been granted a preliminary injunction against Chinese copycat brand Baneberry/ The alleged infringers were discovered when Xinboli Trading