Crypto ÂGramÂ use sparks trade mark infringement battle

Categories: Blockchain, Buying A Business, Disputes, Selling a Business

Michael Coyle
May 16, 2018

With the use and interest in cryptocurrencies growing dramatically over the past year, it is no surprise that everyone wants to jump on the band wagon.

This does not include the buying and selling of the popular cryptocurrencies, but also the setting up of other smaller cryptocurrencies or sites on which the currencies can be sold.

As brand protection is so important for businesses, there has been some trade mark disputes arising.

The latest trade mark dispute involves Telegram Messenger who are a UK based messenger service.

The Telegram Messenger was set up by Telegram Group, who were founded in 2013. Their goal was to develop online products and services using encrypted technology.

In addition to the Telegram Messenger App, they also are the owner of a trade mark in the US for ÂGramÂ which is used in relation to the companyÂs financial products and services relating to cryptocurrencies.

In 2017, Telegram Group launched the Telegram Open Network which was used to produce a fully scalable blockchain to add stability and bring speed into the cryptocurrency process. The ÂGramÂ mark was used directly in connection with this.

Around this time US Blockchain company, Lantah filed an intent to use trade mark application for the word ÂGramÂ, for use in respect of financial services relating to cryptocurrencies.

Following this application, Lantah launched a coin offering service under the ÂGramÂ name.

Telegram Group then filed an application for an injunction against the use of the ÂGramÂ by Lantah. The claim states that there is inevitable likelihood of confusion and the continued use will cause damage to Telegram GroupÂs goodwill and reputation.

In addition, the claim highlights that due to the nature of cryptocurrencies, the confusion will be heightened.

It will be interesting to see how this case pans out, as it may have a ripple effect on brand protection of other cryptos.

For more information on cryptocurrencies and blockchain, please contact our Dr Michael Coyle

share this Article

Recent Articles

Acceptable Non-Infringing Alternatives in Patent Damages: A Comparative Analysis of UK and US Approaches

Introduction The assessment of damages following a finding of patent infringement is governed by the fundamental principle that damages must compensate for actual loss. An

UK Online Defamation: Jurisdiction and Venue in England, Scotland, and NI

Key Takeaways Key takeaways before you decide where to sue for online defamation in the UK: Online defamation spreads fast. A single post can reach

Small Claims: Solicitors vs. McKenzie Friends vs. Self-Representation

Key Takeaways for Busy Business Owners Traffic-light snapshot: Green (self-representation often fine): clear unpaid invoices, simple supply disputes, one-off consumer-style problems with good paperwork. Amber

Written By:

Michael Coyle

Michael is Lawdit’s Principal and heads our Commercial and Intellectual Property Department. As a Solicitor Advocate, he is one of a select group of legal experts qualified to represent clients as an advocate in the Higher Courts in England and Wales. He holds a Master of Laws degree (LL.M) from Nottingham Trent University and is a guest lecturer at Southampton Solent University. He has also completed a teaching stint at the Academy of Music in Guildford where Michael taught copyright law. Michael is highly regarded for his work in all areas of intellectual property law (which includes the eCommerce and IT fields), litigation and company/commercial matters. He regularly advises on non-contentious issues including regulatory and statutory obligations and has been involved in many successful disputes, with a strong reputation for finding common sense and practical solutions for clients. In 2017, Michael was awarded the honorary degree of Doctor of Law from Southampton Solent University for his contribution to the University and his continued support to its students.