Court of Appeal Decision – Law Society Complaint & Confidentiality

The Court of Appeal has held (in dismissing an appeal) that a Barrister who made a complaint against his instructing Solicitor did not owe a duty of care to the Solicitor by not disclosing details of the outcome of the adjudication when the content of the complaint against the Solicitor did not contain a private subject matter.

Mr Michael Napier Solicitor appealed against a decision by Mr Justice Eady not to grant an injunction against Pressdram Ltd to prevent it from publishing details of the complaint in its well know magazine ‘Private Eye’.

However as the matter regarded a conflict of interest complaint no injunction was granted. The matter was unsuccessfully appealed.


If you’d like to know more about this article please send an email to Unknown quoting the article title and any questions you might have, alternatively call the office number on 02380 235 979 or send an enquiry through our contact form.

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

How are NFT’s regulated in the UK?

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has not yet provided guidance on NFT’s specifically with regards to regulation in the United Kingdom (UK). However, the FCA

What is an NFT and why create one?

NFT stands for non-fungible token. Non-fungible essentially means the token is unique and cannot be replaced with another. For example, a Bitcoin is fungible, so,