Article 5 of Directive 2008/95, entitled ÂRights conferred by a trade markÂ, provides:
Â1. The registered trade mark shall confer on the proprietor exclusive rights therein. The proprietor shall be entitled to prevent all third parties not having his consent from using in the course of trade:
(a) any sign which is identical with the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which the trade mark is registered
(b) any sign where, because of its identity with, or similarity to, the trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade mark and the sign, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association between the sign and the trade mark.
2. Any Member State may also provide that the proprietor shall be entitled to prevent all third parties not having his consent from using in the course of trade any sign which is identical with, or similar to, the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are not similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, where the latter has a reputation in the Member State and where use of that sign without due cause takes unfair advantage of, or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the trade mark.
3. The following, inter alia, may be prohibited under paragraphs 1 and 2:
(a) affixing the sign to the goods or to the packaging thereof
(b) offering the goods, or putting them on the market or stocking them for these purposes under that sign, or offering or supplying services thereunder
(c) importing or exporting the goods under that sign
(d) using the sign on business papers and in advertising.
The ECJ held that Article 5(1)(a) and (b) was to be used only where the advertisement had been placed by the third party or on his behalf. So therefore the third party did not make a use of that sign.