Louis Vuitton’s signature chequered squares are not distinctive enough to be trade marked

Louis Vuitton- one of the worlds most valuable brands first started using the squares design in 1889 and, trademarked the design 100 years later. The first trade mark which was for the dark brown and beige square design was granted in 1998. The company registered a further trade mark in 2008, this trade mark was for the same design but the in the colours black and grey. Both these trade marks were used by the brand for leather brands and bags.

In 2008 Louis Vuitton applied to register its chequered squares as a trade mark. The following year Nanu-Nana filed an application to have the trade mark declared invalid. This was granted in 2011.

Louis Vuitton has been fighting to protect the trade mark since 2009, however in a blow to the company last week The European Union’s General Court upheld a previous ruling by the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmoniasation in the Internal Market (OHIM). It has been ruled that the chequered pattern does not differ enough to other leather goods and bags. Officials commented that the design is commonplace and not particularly associated with Louis Vuitton. As such the contested trade mark, in the absence of features capable of distinguishing it from other representations of checkerboards, was not capable of fulfilling the essential ‘identification’ or ‘origin’ function of a trade mark.

The European General Court has now cancelled two community trademarks registered by Louis Vuitton for its leather products.

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

Overview of IP rights

The pandemic has caused many businesses to invest in selling their goods or services online. This has meant that many businesses have had to invest

Burberry granted injunction against Baneberry

Multi billion-dollar luxury fashion brand Burberry has been granted a preliminary injunction against Chinese copycat brand Baneberry/ The alleged infringers were discovered when Xinboli Trading