ECJ limits confusion to German-speaking member states only

The ECJ held that Articles 1(2), 9(1)(b) and 102(1) of the EU trade mark (EUTM) Regulation (207/2009) meant that, where the earlier court found that the use of a sign created a likelihood of confusion within only one part of the EU the earlier court MUST issue an order which effectively splits the confusion.

The Regional Court in Dusseldorf found that  “combit” by a company selling software under the word sign “Commit” was only infringed for the average German-speaking consumer, but not for English-speaking consumers.

The decision followed from its judgment in DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA, Case C-235/09Â

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

Overview of IP rights

The pandemic has caused many businesses to invest in selling their goods or services online. This has meant that many businesses have had to invest

Burberry granted injunction against Baneberry

Multi billion-dollar luxury fashion brand Burberry has been granted a preliminary injunction against Chinese copycat brand Baneberry/ The alleged infringers were discovered when Xinboli Trading