Costs – Indemnity basis and standard basis

Where costs are awarded on a standard basis the court will only allow costs which are proportionate (ie whether necessary) to the matters in issue and if the court has any doubt as to whether the costs are reasonably incurred or reasonable and proportionate in amount, it resolves the doubt in favour of the paying party. This can be seen in the case of Home Office v Lownds [2002] EWCA Civ 365.

Where costs are awarded on an indemnity basis the court resolves any doubt it may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount in favour of the receiving party. There is no requirement for the costs to be proportionate. The court will not allow costs which have been unreasonably incurred or are unreasonable in amount.

According to CPR 44.5(1) where costs are assessed on the standard basis the payee can expect to recover costs “proportionately and reasonably incurred” or “proportionate and reasonable in amount”; and where costs are assessed on the indemnity basis the payee can expect to recover all his costs except those that were “unreasonably incurred” or were “unreasonable in amount”.

If you’d like to know more about this article please send an email to Martin O’Brien quoting the article title and any questions you might have, alternatively call the office number on 02380 235 979 or send an enquiry through our contact form.

share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Recent Articles

Overview of IP rights

The pandemic has caused many businesses to invest in selling their goods or services online. This has meant that many businesses have had to invest

Burberry granted injunction against Baneberry

Multi billion-dollar luxury fashion brand Burberry has been granted a preliminary injunction against Chinese copycat brand Baneberry/ The alleged infringers were discovered when Xinboli Trading